Baseline reconstruction + 16 Aug 2026 progression update
Muscle-up digital twin.
The original three-attempt baseline remains reconstructed frame by frame below. New footage now shows three full turnovers to stable support; the current bottleneck is repeatability across later attempts.
60 Hz primary pose33 tracked landmarks10 Hz scene tracking±9.6 px bar uncertainty
NEW / 16 AUG 2026
Three first-attempt successes. Seven attempts, three clips, one repeatability pattern.
Inspect original and annotated video, synchronized telemetry, every reviewed attempt window, uncertainty, coaching priorities and the next-session capture protocol.
Open full practice updateAttempts detected32.28–24.68 sBest attempt#1relative within videoChest deficit11 cm9–14 cm sensitivity envelopeElbow timing+0.32 safter peak COM, #1Model agreement13.6 pxmedian common-joint gap
01 / Synchronized evidence
Playback lab
Scrub once; video, telemetry, 2D overlay, plots, and 3D twin stay synchronized.
Tracked barindependent per-frame 3D lineAthlete ↔ bar depthcamera-frame, estimated metresGrip ↔ bar3D finger distance during contact
COM / bar−1.22 m
Vertical speed+0.04 m/s
Elbow angle161°
Power proxy37 W
Frame-level telemetryClick a trace or drag to zoom. Dashed lines mark attempt windows.
02 / Performance diagnosis
What stopped the transition
Each conclusion is tied to a timestamped metric and bounded by what one oblique camera can support.
Attempt-level comparison. Power is a COM-derived proxy.All attempts complete elbow flexion after peak body height.Camera-stabilized, tracked-bar-relative COM paths; color runs start to finish.Sensitivity to smoothing, ±7% image scale, and tracked-bar centerline uncertainty.Measured handheld-camera motion and active grip-bar trajectory across the full recording.Visual audit: the tracked centerline follows the perspective-sloped bar actually gripped in every shown frame.
03 / Scene depth
Relative depth + segmentation
Depth Anything V2 estimates per-frame relative inverse depth. Color is normalized independently for each frame and is not metres.
Do not compare depth colors across timestamps. Each view is independently normalized; it supports scene layering and a visualization-only point cloud, not metric travel.
04 / Frame evidence
Key movement events
Knee tuck, maximum COM height, and minimum elbow angle for each trial.
tracked active grip bar estimated COM pose model
05 / Scientific honesty
Measured, modeled, proxied
The twin is useful because its boundaries are visible—not hidden.
Observed
Direct video evidence
Frames and timestamps
Static-background features
Paired grip-bar edges
2D landmark locations / outcome
Estimated
Calibrated + model-derived
Camera transform + bar interpolation
Image-plane metres from height
33-joint pose + YOLO cross-check
Relative scene depth / masks
Proxy
Mechanics approximations
Segment-weighted COM
Velocity and acceleration
Vertical force / energy / power
Within-video ranking
Not identifiable
Requires more sensors
Ground-truth scene depth / joint torque
Individual muscle activation
Tendon load or injury diagnosis
Force-plate-grade power
Pipeline, calibration, and limitations expand
06 / Open evidence
Download everything
Original identifiable footage is public with the athlete’s explicit approval. Derived data preserve provenance and proxy labels.